“Good morning, angels,” the voice on the telephone would say. “Good morning, Charlie,” the three lovely women would reply. The premise of 1976’sCharlie’s Angels, a crime drama that aired on ABC for five seasons, centered on three talented, capable, and ass-kicking women who solved crimes while working for an elusive and unseen boss, Charles Towsend. Like every popular IP in Hollywood, the show received the big screen treatment in the new millennium, with two movies in 2000 and 2003, followed by a reboot in 2019.
The threeCharlie’s Angelsmovies aren’t exactly the pinnacle of the action genre. They are uneven and pretty by the numbers, settling for offering basic entertainment and more than a few laughs with a few occasional action setpieces that stand out without exactly redefining the genre. However, there is actual value in them, whether because of nostalgia — the first two are perfect portrayals of the early 2000s — an appreciation for their often unintentional campy sensibilities, or a genuine taste for their brand of comedy and action. They are also quite singular, for both better and worse; one can accuse them of a lot of things, but these films are far from boring.This list will rank all threeCharlie’s Angelsmoviesbased on their narratives, action sequences, humor, and overall quality.
3’Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttle' (2003)
Directed by McG
Cameron Diaz,Drew Barrymore, andLucy Liureunited for a second time in 2003’sCharlie’s Angels: Full Throttle. The plot sees the group on a mission to recover two missing rings containing the real identity of every person in the Witness Protection Program, including Dylan’s (Barrymore). Meanwhile, they realize they are against violent and dangerous Irish criminal Seamus O’Grady (Justin Theroux), a figure from Dylan’s past, while crossing paths with the legendary Madison Lee (Demi Moore), a former angel who might be hiding secrets of her own.
Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttleislouder, dumber, and far more inept than its predecessor. The action is more over-the-top but half as compelling, with excessive use of slow-motion and choreography far too exaggerated to be believable without any skill or stylishness. Diaz, Barrymore, and Liu arestill entertaining and compelling leads, even if the screenplay does its best to depict them as one-dimensional eye candy, andMoore is a scene-stealing villain, doing the most with Madison’s one-note characterization and considerably elevating the movie. The lateBernie Macis also a worthy addition, bringing some much-needed comedic energy into an otherwise boring movie. Alas, the performers' efforts are not enough to rescue this misguided film from mediocrity;Charlie’s Angels: Full Throttleincludesall the worst traits a sequel can have: it sacrifices any sort of emotional connection or ambition in favor of cheap jokes, underwhelming action, and so much cheese it could put a Domino’s out of business.
Rent on Amazon
2’Charlie’s Angels' (2019)
Directed by Elizabeth Banks
A reboot ofCharlie’s Angelswas always bound to happen — if anything, it’s quite surprising it took over fifteen years to happen. Finally, in 2019,Elizabeth Banksstepped behind the camera to direct Oscar nomineeKristen Stewart, former Disney Channel starNaomi Scott, and relative newcomerElla Balinskain a new take on the popular IP. This time, the plot centers on scientist Elena (Scott), whose newly invented energy source falls into the wrong hands. Recruited by the Townsend Agency, Elena joins two top agents, Sabina (Stewart) and Jane (Balinska), as they try to recover it and save the world.
2019’sCharlie’s Angelsis an odd effort.It’s thrilling enough but lacks something— style? Panache? Individuality? It’s actually quite a solid action vehicle, albeit one that’s not particularly memorable despite its abundance of charm.The film is a pulpy blend of genres, going all-in on the sisterhood between the three characters while paying little attention to the side characters, including the villain. Indeed,Charlie’s Angelslacks a truly great action movie villainto take it to the next level — no offense to SirPatrick Stewart, who can only do so much with a paper-thin role brought further down by one ofthe most obvious twists in movie history.Stewart, Scott, and Balinska are good, if a tad underdeveloped, especially compared to both trios that came before them, but they simply can’t do everything on their own. Banks is there to lend some help as the girls' Bosley, but she, too, feels overstretched. The result isa messy and needlessly contrived moviethat leaps forward just as many times as it stumbles, never quite soaring above the average.
Charlie’s Angels
1’Charlie’s Angels' (2000)
The firstCharlie’s Angelsmovie is certainly not perfect, but boy is it enjoyable. Cameron Diaz, Drew Barrymore, and Lucy Liu star as Natalie, Dylan, and Alex, three beautiful and highly capable agents working for the Townsend Agency under the guidance of the mysterious and unseen Charlie. The trio is tasked with rescuing kidnapped billionaire Eric Knox (Sam Rockwell) and helping keep his voice-analysis software safe from dangerous hands. Aided by Charlie’s assistant, Bosley (Bill Murray), the angels go into the mission without imagining it’ll be far more dangerous than they could imagine.
Charlie’s Angelsisa great mix of action, humor, and cheesecake. It opts for a self-aware and tongue-in-cheek approach, often winking at its audience every time a particularly silly joke or dialogue is uttered. Diaz, Barrymore, and Liu are perfect together, creating an effortless dynamic that carries the film all the way to the top.The trio delivers three evenly matched movie star performancesthat ably support every corner of the movie, taking it further through effortless charisma.Equally important isRockwell doing what he does best: playing one of the most detestable and infuriating villains who is as cool as he is punchable.Behind-the-scenes drama aside,Charlie’s Angelsis a pretty incredible action movie that aims to entertain without holding any higher or more complex aspirations.It’s loud and proud of what it is, flashing a dashing smile at the world that’s just about enchanting enough to cast its spell on any viewer willing to let themselves be conquered.
